What Do All the Best University Students All Have in Common?
Bain, who is provost, vice president for academic affairs, and a professor of history and urban education at the University of the District of Columbia, says the book looks at about 30 college graduates from all kinds of institutions — community colleges, liberal arts colleges and big research universities — who exhibited a lot of creativity and productivity in their post-college lives. In the book, which is geared toward students, he tries to figure out how their approaches to college explain their behavior.
He identifies several factors: “One was that they followed their passions,” he says. “They came to realize the power of both being able to look inside themselves and to tap their own unique histories and personalities, and at the same time to realize that they were unique, so was everyone else, and they could learn from a wide variety of people.”
These students also believed that intelligence and abilities are malleable and expandable with effort, Bain says, along with a capacity for coping with emotional traumas by comforting themselves, finding a purpose in life, and using that purpose to motivate themselves to work.
“It was that capacity for understanding what could motivate them — what purpose they might have in life — that was at the heart of their own motivation,” he says. “And what that meant was that they knew how to delay immediate gratification for the sake of long-term achievement.”
What instructors can do
Citing a Swedish experiment from the 1970s, Bain says most learning approaches fall into three broad categories: the surface approach — students interested primarily in surviving the course — the strategic approach — students driven by a desire to receive good grades and accolades — and the deep approach.
These deep learners use intrinsic motivators rather than extrinsic motivators, such as grades. “They found a passion within themselves rather than depending on someone else to motivate them,” he says.
Bain says the deep approach to learning comes through conditioning: “It isn’t a result of personality; it isn’t a result of any levels of intelligence,” he says. “Much of that conditioning occurs in school.”
Instructors must give students ways to learn and find success through trial and error — all before making a mark in the gradebook. This way, students take time during the process to develop their interests instead of being motivated solely by receiving a good grade.
But today’s education climate makes it difficult for teachers to avoid fostering surface or strategic approaches, he says. “A lot of traditional education does in fact foster a very strategic or surface approach to learning rather than that deep approach.”
For example, advisers perpetuate the strategic approach by telling students about certain courses they must “get out of the way.”
“Students are under enormous economic pressure to finish early, get out in the marketplace – to take that very strategic approach,” he says. “Part of the conditioning goes on because of the economic and political pressures that they face to finish early, not to explore, not to follow their curiosity and not to take charge of their learning.”
The decline in funding and public support for higher education drives institutions, instructors and students to take a strategic approach to higher education, Bain says. Students are more likely to be in bigger classes, where they receive less individual attention to their own particular passions and interests, he says.
“The changing political and economic climate has created a situation that makes it increasingly difficult for students to take that deep approach,” he says.
Bain says the type of institution doesn’t determine whether faculty teach well and foster deep learning approaches. “Liberal arts faculty and professors at major research universities can create engaging learning environments, but so can community college faculty,” he says. “And they can all create lousy learning environments.”
Bain’s first book, What the Best College Teachers Do, published in 2004, addressed instructors from different types of institutions and disciplines fostered deep approaches and achievements in learning.
The book featured some instructors who taught classes of 1,000 people, and they found ways to foster collaborative, deep learning even though they faced more difficulties than instructors of better-funded, smaller classes: “There are ways of doing it, it’s just more difficult to do that,” he says.
Article by Inside Higher Ed